NPR’s Ailsa Chang speaks to Dr. Jonathan Slotkin concerning the new knowledge launched by Waymo about accidents and their self-driving automobiles.
AILSA CHANG, HOST:
Dr. Jonathan Slotkin had witnessed this scene too many occasions on the trauma middle the place he works.
JONATHAN SLOTKIN: They’re wheeling in a young person, and this one’s been ejected by means of a windshield and located 30 toes away, face down within the grime, and all of us acknowledge there’s nothing we will do. And so I am considering to myself, how can we let the equal of 1 airplane full of individuals, greater than 100 lives, be misplaced each single day as the price of driving? If this was a illness, we’d have declared battle.
CHANG: And proper round this time, Slotkin had been knowledge launched by the driverless automotive firm Waymo. This was its so-called 100-million-mile knowledge set.
SLOTKIN: And I checked out this knowledge and mentioned, God, this nearly appears to be like too good to be true. If we pursue this proper, for my part, we face the potential for really eliminating automotive accidents as a number one reason behind dying in the US.
CHANG: Slotkin described this epiphany in an op-ed for The New York Instances, writing, quote, “whereas many see this as a tech story, I view it as a public well being breakthrough.” Dr. Jonathan Slotkin, welcome.
SLOTKIN: Thanks for having me, Ailsa.
CHANG: So that you wrote that this Waymo visitors accident knowledge led you to conclude that autonomous autos could possibly be a public well being breakthrough. What did the info present precisely that convinces you of this?
SLOTKIN: What I noticed was that we had higher than a 90% discount in probably the most critical forms of crashes that we see. So these are pedestrians struck, T-bones in intersections, that are among the worst accidents we see within the trauma bay. So it actually appears to be like like, Ailsa, that if we pursue this proper now going ahead, we might eradicate automotive accidents as a number one reason behind dying in the US.
CHANG: OK. But when we’re speaking about security, there have been current reviews of Waymos driving fairly aggressively, like making unlawful U-turns, neglecting flip alerts, illegally passing stopped faculty buses. And simply final week, personally, a Waymo reduce me off in transferring visitors proper right here in LA. And also you even talked about in your op-ed just a few fatalities. So should not any of that be a trigger for concern?
SLOTKIN: Nicely, certain. Let me level out for those who did not learn it, these fatalities had been each not the fault of the Waymo, OK? And there was one critical harm as nicely that was additionally not the fault of the Waymo driver. However definitely, these are questions we’ve to ask, and so they’re all truthful questions. The college bus factor, that is critical. We won’t have this stuff passing faculty buses. And what I perceive is that they recognized a spot the place the automobiles had been getting confused, and so they issued a recall to replace…
CHANG: Precisely.
SLOTKIN: …The software program. However I feel let us take a look at the choice. The choice is human drivers illegally passing faculty buses a whole lot of 1000’s of occasions a 12 months as a result of they’re impatient. And right here we’ve a robotic that makes a mistake, and it may be quickly remedied with a software program replace. So I feel we settle for people being reckless as the value of mobility, however we would like the robots to be excellent. And someplace within the center there, I feel, Ailsa, is the place we must always land.
CHANG: I feel, for me, any form of lingering discomfort I’ve with autonomous autos is simply this inherent belief I’ve in human supervision. Like, I need a human to have the ability to intervene in probably dangerous conditions. Is that illogical?
SLOTKIN: It is a pure human tendency, I feel, to be afraid of the issues we understand we won’t management, and we run into that in well being care lots. This I-can-drive-after-two-drinks factor some folks have – nicely, that is the notion of management, however I am afraid of the robotic that really is statistically higher than me, however as a result of I can not management it. And I feel, for me, that is the place the info must begin to take us and say, nicely, look, that is really higher.
CHANG: Nicely, let me ask you this. Self-driving automobiles are nonetheless a reasonably slim minority of automobiles on the highway, even in cities like LA, the place I’m, the place these automobiles appear to be all over the place. So wanting full adoption, is there actually a public well being profit to having even just some self-driving automobiles on the highway?
SLOTKIN: Yeah, so this will get to an attention-grabbing query, and nobody really is aware of the whole reply, however there’s some printed knowledge that exhibits that as these scale, definitely early within the adoption, chances are you’ll get disproportionate advantages even relative to how a lot has been adopted. So let’s make up a quantity and say, we might have 30% adoption however really lower fatalities by 40%. And that will get to issues like community results.
And, Ailsa, we’ve not even scratched the floor actually on hive conduct between these autos the place they start speaking to one another in an elevated method. They relay issues about security challenges forward and so they behave higher round one another. So there’s proof that even early within the adoption curve, we are going to see security advantages.
CHANG: Dr. Jonathan Slotkin, thanks very a lot, and comfortable driving to you.
SLOTKIN: Thanks, Ailsa. Thanks for having me.
CHANG: And we reached out to Waymo concerning the highway security violations talked about on this story. The corporate responded in a written assertion that mentioned, partly, security is key to all the things that we do. The information exhibits we’re bettering highway security within the communities through which we function.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts could differ. Transcript textual content could also be revised to right errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or publication. The authoritative file of NPR’s programming is the audio file.