Please observe: On this article, the time period ‘girls’ is used inclusively to embody all people who menstruate or have menstruated, no matter gender identification.
Let’s be clear: Entry to actual, evidence-based well being info shouldn’t be controversial—however right here we’re.
In a political local weather the place girls’s our bodies are consistently below fireplace, the quiet erasure of greater than 8,000 pages from federal well being web sites isn’t simply suspicious—it’s harmful.
These aren’t simply random webpages; they’re very important sources on every part from contraception and maternal mortality to LGBTQ+ youth well being and scientific trial variety. The form of info that saves lives, helps suppliers, and empowers folks to make knowledgeable decisions about their our bodies.
And now? It’s gone—scrubbed from websites just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA with little rationalization and 0 accountability. If that feels like a conflict on girls, properly… you’re not unsuitable.
When politics begins dictating what well being info we’re allowed to entry, it’s as much as us to battle again. Which means getting louder, getting smarter, and turning to impartial, science-backed girls’s well being sources that put public well being earlier than political agendas. As a result of nobody—not a politician, not a bureaucrat—will get to determine what we do or don’t need to find out about our personal rattling our bodies.
Why Authorities-Equipped Well being Data is Disappearing
For many years, federal well being companies just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA have been go-to sources for reliable medical info. However in current months, one thing alarming has occurred behind the scenes: 1000’s of pages of girls’s well being content material have quietly vanished.
This isn’t a coincidence—it’s a calculated shift.
Right here’s what’s been eliminated, why it issues, and who’s being harmed essentially the most.
What’s Been Eliminated and Why It Issues
Entry to complete, research-based well being and wellness info is important to the well-being of girls. But the U.S. authorities has just lately modified or eliminated greater than 8,000 pages1,2,4 from federal well being web sites—severely limiting entry to essential medical steerage.
These deletions have an effect on sources from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH), the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), and the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). This contains very important public well being info on subjects equivalent to HIV and sexually transmitted ailments, contraceptive utilization and security, scientific trial variety, maternal mortality and morbidity, transgender well being, and LGBTQ+ youth well being.1,2,3,4.
Who This Impacts Most
The suppression of this info disproportionately impacts girls, minorities, and different marginalized people.
With out these sources, sufferers, healthcare suppliers, and researchers face vital challenges in making knowledgeable selections about remedy choices, preventive care, and wellness methods.
Eradicating this content material doesn’t simply prohibit entry to data—it undermines progress in gender-specific medical analysis and healthcare fairness.
[SIDEBAR: In December 2024, a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) found that the NIH has consistently failed to prioritize and fund research on women’s health.⁶ The report called for an additional $16 billion in funding to close the gap.But with the current administration’s clear bias—and what some are calling an outright war on women—the likelihood of that funding materializing is slim to none.]
Luckily, there are advocates on the market working to archive this info and make it out there to the general public5. This text accommodates an inventory of those recovered sources.
The Political Undermining of Public Well being
Whereas the transition of presidency from one social gathering to a different shouldn’t have an effect on the provision of evidence-based well being and wellness info, it has. This alarming development highlights the pressing want for impartial, non-governmental sources of evidence-based well being sources.
The Position of Advocacy Organizations
Fortunately, not all hope is misplaced. Organizations just like the Society for Girls’s Well being Analysis (SWHR) are main the cost to guard and advance girls’s well being by way of coverage, training, and science.
For instance, SWHR is dedicated to making sure that the “Intercourse as a Organic Variable” coverage stays in place on the NIH—a essential step in making certain that ailments, remedies, and medical interventions are researched with girls’s distinctive physiology in thoughts.
The well being wants of girls change throughout the lifespan, from reproductive years by way of menopause and past, making entry to stage-specific, research-backed sources much more essential.
Trusted, Proof-Primarily based Girls’s Well being Assets
Beneath is a curated listing of evidence-based, non-governmental sources. These organizations present science-backed steerage tailor-made to the distinctive well being issues of girls of their reproductive years, throughout the menopausal transition, and post-menopause. By looking for out and sharing these sources, we will collectively safeguard entry to very important well being data and make sure that all girls have the knowledge they should thrive at each stage of life.
Teen/Reproductive Years:
Reproductive Well being Entry Mission
Trains and helps major care clinicians to develop entry to reproductive well being care—together with abortion, contraception, and miscarriage care. Affords free, multilingual, evidence-based affected person training supplies and advocates for fairness in scientific coaching and care.
Perimenopause/Menopause:
The North American Menopause Society
A number one impartial group providing evidence-based info on menopause and midlife girls’s well being. A trusted useful resource for each healthcare suppliers and the general public.
A number of Life Phases:
The American Faculty of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
A go-to supply for dependable, science-backed girls’s well being info. Empowers sufferers to have knowledgeable conversations with their ob-gyn and take an lively position of their care.
Deliberate Parenthood
A nationwide chief in accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare and training. Advocates for inexpensive, high-quality providers and is the most important supplier of intercourse training within the U.S.
Our Our bodies Ourselves
Affords rigorously vetted well being and sexuality info that integrates medical experience with lived expertise. Prioritizes inclusivity and facilities the voices of girls and gender-expansive people.
Wholesome Girls
Centered on girls aged 35 to 64, this group offers medically reviewed, evidence-based content material that helps wholesome ageing and empowered self-advocacy.
Massachusetts Normal Hospital Middle for Girls’s Psychological Well being: Reproductive Psychiatry Useful resource & Info Middle
Affords reproductive psychiatry sources throughout life phases, with specialised help for BIPOC people looking for culturally aligned care.
Middle for Science within the Public Curiosity
A science-based advocacy group selling public well being by way of vitamin, meals coverage reform, and transparency. Prioritizes illness prevention and meals fairness.
Take Cost: Keep Knowledgeable, Keep Empowered
In a time when entry to reliable well being info is being stripped away, staying knowledgeable isn’t simply essential—it’s a type of resistance. Each particular person deserves science-backed, inclusive sources that help knowledgeable decisions, not political agendas.
So bookmark these hyperlinks. Share them with your mates, your purchasers, your healthcare suppliers. Assist the organizations doing the exhausting work to maintain this info alive. And above all, don’t let anybody let you know that your well being isn’t price preventing for. As a result of it’s. All the time. —Karin
References
- https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/upshot/trump-government-websites-missing-pages.html
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/federal-agencies-websites-trump/
- https://swhr.org/a-january-2025-policy-recap-from-swhr/
- https://www.reuters.com/enterprise/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-drops-web-pages-improving-clinical-trial-diversity-2025-01-24/
- https://contrarian.substack.com/p/public-health-websites-are-going
- https://www.science.org/content material/article/nih-needs-new-institute-women-s-health-research-expert-panel-says