Why Trump and Harris are turning to podcasts


That is an version of The Atlantic Day by day, a e-newsletter that guides you thru the most important tales of the day, helps you uncover new concepts, and recommends the very best in tradition. Join it right here.

Kamala Harris is within the midst of a media blitz this week, together with an interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes yesterday night and an look on The Late Present With Stephen Colbert tonight. However she can be dipping into the world of mega-popular, not straightforwardly journalistic podcasts—notably showing on the present Name Her Daddy final weekend. I spoke with my colleague Helen Lewis, who covers the podcast-sphere, about why Donald Trump and Harris are each spending time on these types of exhibits, what these interviews keep away from, and the way impartial podcasters turned main gamers in political media.


The New Mainstream

Lora Kelley: How does the worth to the viewer of a standard press interview—one centered on the precise points and insurance policies of the race—differ from that of a way of life podcast?

Helen Lewis: Roughly talking, there are two varieties of sit-down conversations in politics: the accountability interview and the talk-show look. One focuses on pinning down candidates on their previous statements and their future guarantees; the opposite, which most podcasts fall into, tries to grasp the candidate as an individual. The latter aren’t essentially mushy choices—being charismatic and fascinating whereas making small speak or fielding deeply private questions is a ability in itself. (And I discovered Donald Trump’s look on Theo Von’s podcast, the place he talked about his elder brother’s battle with alcoholism, very revealing certainly.)

However solely with the accountability interviews do you get candidates pressed repeatedly on questions that they’re making an attempt to dodge. On Logan Paul’s podcast, Impaulsive, Trump was requested in regards to the transmission of fentanyl over the border, and he received away with rambling about how “unbelievable” the German shepherds Border Patrol officers use are. On Lex Fridman’s podcast, Trump asserted that he may simply kind out the disaster in Ukraine—and that was it. Who wants particulars? When Kamala Harris went on Name Her Daddy, the host, Alex Cooper, gave her an opportunity to put out her message on reproductive rights however didn’t, for instance, problem her on whether or not she helps third-trimester abortions, that are deeply divisive.

Lora: From the attitude of a political marketing campaign, are there any downsides to showing on a podcast comparable to Name Her Daddy?

Helen: The apparent criticism of Harris showing on Name Her Daddy, which has a younger, feminine viewers, is that she already has an enormous lead amongst younger ladies aged 18–25. You’ll be able to say the identical about Trump showing on podcasts which are fashionable with younger males. However each teams include many individuals who will likely be undecided about whether or not to vote in any respect.

Lora: Harris has executed some conventional press interviews throughout this marketing campaign cycle, together with her 60 Minutes interview yesterday. However are we in a brand new period during which chats with pleasant podcasters rival (and even overtake) conventional media interviews?

Helen: Properly, fairly. An article I take into consideration lots is John Herrman’s 2015 “Entry Denied,” during which he requested why an A-lister—somebody like Kim Kardashian—would give an interview to a star journal if she had one thing to promote, as a substitute of merely placing an image on Instagram. Why cooperate with the outdated guard of media when they’re not the gatekeepers of consideration? Herrman argued that the standard media was struggling a “lack of energy leading to a lack of entry leading to additional lack of energy.”

That dynamic has now migrated to politics. The legacy manufacturers not have a monopoly on individuals’s consideration, and the net proper, specifically, has been extraordinarily profitable in constructing another, extremely partisan media. Fox Information is not the rightmost finish of the spectrum—past that’s Tucker Carlson’s podcast, or the Day by day Wire community, or Newsmax, or Elon Musk’s X.

Now candidates have a tendency to speak to the standard media solely once they wish to reset the narrative about them, as a result of different journalists nonetheless watch 60 Minutes or no matter it is perhaps. There’s nonetheless a noisiness round an enormous legacy interview that you just don’t get with, say, Name Her Daddy—even when extra individuals find yourself consuming the latter.

Lora: Are these podcasts actually doing something new, or are they largely replicating conventional media interviews with out the identical requirements and accountability?

Helen: The higher ones attempt for impartiality and don’t, for instance, reveal their questions prematurely—however many political podcasts are wrapped in an ecosystem the place big-name friends imply extra promoting income, and thus greater earnings for the hosts personally; plus, their solely hope of getting a second interview is that if the candidate feels the primary one was sympathetic. Evaluate that with 60 Minutes, which interviewed Trump so robustly in 2020 that he has requested for an apology.

I’m as responsible as anybody, however we have to cease treating these podcasts because the “various” media when they’re completely the mainstream nowadays. The highest ones have audiences as large as, if not greater than, most legacy shops. In the event that they don’t wish to rent all of the editorial infrastructure that conventional journalism has (comparable to fact-checkers, analysis assistants, and so forth.), or threat being unpopular by asking troublesome questions, that’s on them. Joe Rogan renewed his Spotify contract for $250 million. Alex Cooper signed a take care of SiriusXM this 12 months price $125 million. We should always cease treating the mega-podcasts like mom-and-pop outfits competing with chain shops. They’re behemoths.

Lora: You latterly wrote about The Joe Rogan Expertise, which is the top-listened-to podcast on Spotify and arguably probably the most influential behemoth of all of them. Why haven’t the candidates gone on the present but? Who from every ticket do you suppose would take advantage of sense as a visitor?

Helen: As I perceive it, Crew Trump would like to get on The Joe Rogan Expertise. The 2 politicians that Rogan adores are Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who are actually each working with the Republicans, and Crew Trump would hope to encourage a few of Rogan’s viewers of crunchy, COVID-skeptic libertarians to observe them in transferring from the impartial/Democrat column to the GOP. However Rogan isn’t a full MAGA partisan like a few of his mates, and Trump just lately mentioned that Rogan hasn’t requested him to look.

In any case, I believe Rogan would like to speak to J. D. Vance, who could be very a lot a part of the heterodox Silicon Valley–refugee tendency that he admires. For the Democrats, Harris would possibly battle to chill out into the stoner-wonderment vibe of Rogan, given the tight-laced marketing campaign she’s operating. Rogan and Tim Walz may in all probability have a very good chat about capturing deer and the easiest way to barbecue.

Associated:


Listed here are three new tales from The Atlantic:


Right now’s Information

  1. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis introduced that roughly 8,000 Nationwide Guard members will likely be mobilized by the point Hurricane Milton, a Class 5 storm, makes landfall this week.
  2. The Supreme Courtroom seems prone to uphold the Biden administration’s regulation of “ghost gun” kits, which permit individuals to purchase gun components and construct the weapons at dwelling.
  3. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed that the Israeli army has killed the substitute successors of the Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah, who was killed in an Israeli air strike final month.


Dispatches

Discover all of our newsletters right here.


Night Learn

Illustration of three blurry purple circles against a black background, getting clearer from left to right
Illustration by Ben Kothe / The Atlantic. Supply: Getty.

They Have been Made With out Eggs or Sperm. Are They Human?

By Kristen V. Brown

The little clump of cells regarded nearly like a human embryo. Created from stem cells, with out eggs, sperm, or a womb, the embryo mannequin had a yolk sac and a proto-placenta, resembling a state that actual human embryos attain after roughly 14 days of improvement. It even secreted hormones that turned a drugstore being pregnant take a look at constructive.

To Jacob Hanna’s professional eye, the mannequin wasn’t good—extra like a tough sketch … However in 2022, when two college students burst into his workplace and dragged him to a microscope to point out him the cluster of cells, he knew his group had unlocked a door to understanding an important stage of human improvement. Hanna, a professor on the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel, additionally knew that the mannequin would increase some profound moral questions.

Learn the total article.

Extra From The Atlantic


Tradition Break

Lady Gaga and Joaquin Phoenix in the Joker sequel
Warner Bros. / Everett Assortment

Learn. Lauren Elkin’s newest novel, Scaffolding, means that complete honesty can take a wedding solely to this point, Lily Meyer writes.

Watch (or skip). Joker: Folie à Deux (out now in theaters) has nothing fascinating to say in regards to the challenges of fame, Spencer Kornhaber writes.

Play our day by day crossword.


Stephanie Bai contributed to this text.

Whenever you purchase a e book utilizing a hyperlink on this e-newsletter, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *